I’m somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 due to the fact conventional media have actually guaranteed extremely few individuals understand the detail regarding the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested in the uk in the beginning while there is no instance, with no investigation that is genuine. Look at this and also you will know why.
One other thing maybe perhaps maybe not widely comprehended can there be is NO JURY in a rape trial in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TRIAL. Every one of the proof, every one of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no news. Really the only general public part is the charging and also the verdict. There clearly was a judge as well as 2 advisers straight appointed by governmental parties. And that means you never would get to comprehend just exactly how clearly the instance is a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore inconsistencies that are many Anna Ardin’s accusation of intimate assault against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps away at me – and which strangely We have not seen asked anywhere else – is this:
Why did Anna Ardin maybe maybe maybe not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become known when you look at the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used right in front row of Assange’s press seminar. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been intending to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a buddy who was simply trying to find Assange:
“He’s not right right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse with all the girl that is cashmere night, yet not managed to make it. Possibly he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days previously, on 13 August, she was in fact intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being ready to take to (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She ended up being official site also to convey that this attack included enforced sex that is unprotected she had been worried about HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced non-safe sex on her and also this may have sent HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was at risk of her life? And exactly why had been Ardin speaking about with Assange his desire for sex with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information as well as had organised her enrollment for the press seminar. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Let’s fit that into a really brief survey regarding the entire relationship that is ardin/Assange.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press seminar organised with a branch associated with Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat as she will be away for him to stay in.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s got dinner with Assange and they’ve got consensual intercourse, in the very first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into assault by surreptitious mutilation associated with condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to behave as Julian’s press assistant. She sits next to him in the dais at their press seminar. Assange satisfies Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to visit a party that is crayfish anybody have a couple of available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This try to locate a party that is crayfish, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another proposes to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick to me personally. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting out-of-doors at 02:00 and barely freezing with all the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, in accordance with both their authorities testimonies, sleep again in identical solitary sleep, and continue doing therefore for the following couple of days. Assange tells police they continue steadily to have sexual intercourse; Anna tells police they don’t. That night, Anna and Julian get together to, and then leave together from, a supper using the leadership regarding the Pirate Party. They again sleep into the exact same bed.
16 August: Julian would go to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin does not alert her of prospective assault that is sexual. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once more refuses.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say she actually is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague on a single ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen does not want to signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her very own police declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom towards the authorities as proof; but a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to say that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen came ahead never to whine of a assault, but check into STDs. Wilen declined to signal the declaration alleging rape, that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is simple that certain of a couple of things occurred:
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with unsafe sex, but neglected to alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also continued to host Assange, help him, come in general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing duplicated provides to allow for him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the employment of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She talked about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and seems at the least to not have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after unsafe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, so that you can twist Wilen’s tale into a sexual assault – really easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape rules. Wilen declined to signal.
In the authorities place on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did n’t need to place any charges against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted that she ended up being “shocked once they arrested JA because we just wanted him to have a test”.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it had been the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then composed her story that is own of attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could maybe not claim sex that is non-consensual. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event of this condom that is torn. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange about it. Its impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
I’ve no trouble in stating that We securely think Ardin to be a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior that will be, into the sense that is literal incredible.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever likely to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There’s no jury, additionally the federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed straight by governmental events. If Assange would go to Sweden, he can disappear completely into prison, the test is going to be secret, therefore the the next thing you may hear is the fact that he is responsible and a rapist.
Next, needless to say, no matter the data is really so poor, as in order to cry rape would be to tarnish a reputation that is man’s. Anna Ardin has recently succeeded in destroying most of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The facts regarding the whole tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically proper viewpoint falls in behind the line that it’s incorrect also to check out the data. If you’re perhaps not permitted to understand whom the accuser is, how could you learn that she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro teams in Havana and Miami?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that how you can test these matters is with in court, i might state needless to say, you will be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, and then we should positively condemn the disgraceful behavior of the whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.